Evan Mathis is off doing whatever it is that unemployed Pro Bowl guards do when they’re looking for a new team and a paycheck. If things had gone differently, he could have been at the NovaCare Complex when minicamp opened on Tuesday. But things did not go differently. Things deteriorated — slowly at first, then with more speed.
The Eagles cut Mathis last week. Given the increasingly tense relationship between Mathis and Kelly, it probably shouldn’t have been a surprise. Not to mention that we’ve learned quite a few times in the last few months what happens when — as Zach Ertz put it — you go against Kelly.
Tuesday marked the first time since dismissing Mathis that Kelly addressed the situation. So why Mathis, and why before minicamp?
“We were asked by his agent for a release on multiple occasions,” Kelly said. “We weren’t going to come to a conclusion in terms of a contract extension. We weren’t going to extend any contract or adjust any contract. So we granted him what he asked for.”
As Kelly bluntly explained a while ago, the Eagles evidently tried to trade Mathis for the last two years without any takers. Mathis, meanwhile, was unhappy with his contract. He signed a five-year deal in 2012 worth more than $25 million. He would have made $5.5 million this year and $6 million next year. Would have. Now he won’t. Not with the Eagles, at least.
By cutting Mathis, the Eagles save $9.5 million over the next two seasons. They also lose yet another starter from last year’s team. The Eagles let Todd Herremans walk early in the offseason. And now they’ve dismissed Mathis.
The timing here is interesting. Mathis didn’t report for voluntary (in name, if not in expectation or execution) OTAs. But according to what he told CSNPhilly.com Eagles Insider Geoff Mosher via text last week after getting cut, Mathis had a flight to Philly scheduled for Monday and planned to attend minicamp. When asked why he chose to cut Mathis rather than let him show for minicamp, Kelly said the discussion about Mathis honoring his contract had gone on for a while and it was time to move on. He said it was made clear to the team that Mathis wanted to be traded or get a new deal. Absent that, Kelly said the only move was to release him.
“Hopefully I was seeing if he could catch on with someone for the minicamp so he could make a team,” Kelly said.
You can decide for yourself whether to believe the altruistic spin Kelly put on the situation. What happened with Mathis is similar to what’s happened with other players and Eagles personnel over these last few months. Kelly and Howie Roseman didn’t agree. Kelly won. Roseman was pushed aside. Same with LeSean McCoy and DeSean Jackson and Cary Williams and on and on. Mathis was simply the latest person to learn a hard lesson that Kelly has taught quite a few times now.
It is Kelly’s prerogative to keep the players he likes and punt the ones he doesn’t off into the distance. He is the head coach and the head honcho and Jeffrey Lurie wants it that way. That's fine. But that doesn’t change the reality: The Eagles are absent two-fifths of last year’s starting offensive line. That, by itself, is troublesome — and it’s even more worrisome when you consider that the refurbished line will protect a new quarterback with two ACL injuries and a new starting running back coming off last year’s impossibly heavy workload.
“We obviously are down a good football player,” Kelly allowed. “We’re confident in the guys we have. That’s why we made the decision we made.”
Kelly and his coaches and the players have dutifully repeated this refrain. If nothing else, their devotion to the talking points about being confident in the players they have is impressive. They might even believe it. And it might even be true. Allen Barbre figures to be one of the guards. The other position is more uncertain. Dennis Kelly, Matt Tobin and Andrew Gardner are currently jockeying for the spot. Maybe one of them wins the gig. Or maybe they bring in someone else between now and training camp or training camp and the season. As Chip Kelly is fond of reminding us, it’s June. A lot can change between now and September.
Still, it’s hard to imagine that the Eagles are better without Mathis than with him. Even if you believe that Barbre/Kelly/Tobin/Gardner are starting-quality offensive linemen, simply bumping them up a spot on the depth chart hurts the team’s depth. And, as we saw last year, depth was a problem for the Eagles' line.
“Depth is an issue for everyone in this league,” Kelly said. “That’s just part of the deal.”
He’s right. But if depth is a problem for everyone, and it is, then purposefully thinning out the talent pool — rather than, say, coming to some sort of professional (if not monetary) truce with Mathis — is hard to fathom. The two men didn’t need to like each other. They just needed to work together. And the Eagles held the upper hand. They could have fined Mathis $30,000 a day for not reporting to mandatory workouts. They could have forced his position and made him report — or forced him to hemorrhage money while sitting out. He probably wouldn’t have been happy about it, but he’s also a better on-paper option than the guys who served as his backups.
Couldn’t that have been an option? Couldn’t the Eagles have just done the same thing countless other teams have done with countless other players countless times before and told him to report? Wouldn’t Mathis have eventually played for the current contract because he had no other reasonable option?
“I don’t know,” Kelly said.
And now he never will.
Photo Credit: Getty Images